• Mon.: 9:30 AM.
• Tue.: 10:00 AM.

Notes on your Preparation:

• You are expected to read every paper, as always.
• Learn to take good control of your time; don’t try to read through your paper (we’ve read it). Highlight your main arguments when time is short, and elaborate when time permits.
• The reviewer should prepare a one-page memo (for yourself) beforehand so you could get through your points with ease. It also enables you to take note of differences between the paper and the presentation (which we should expect quite a bit given our discussions yesterday).

Order of papers and reviewers:

Time allocation:

• We will meet at 10 AM, and conclude (hopefully) by 6 PM; lunch break after the 3rd AO.
• You are expected to read every AO (mostly done, I hope).
• Learn to take good control of your time. Highlight your main arguments when time is short, and elaborate when time permits.

Order of Presentations: To be Decided on Site

Presenter (black) – reviewer (red) Pairing:

林芳聿 – 潘旻蕙
劉芳宇 – 黃苓禎
于寧欣 – 蔡宗羱
黃苓禎 – 劉芳宇
陳品涵 – 蔡昉潔
潘旻蕙 – 于寧欣
蔡昉潔 – 陳品涵
蔡宗羱 – 林芳聿

Time allocation:

• Lawrence M. Friedman, Law, Lawyers, and Popular Culture, 98 Yale L.J. 1579 (1989).

• FTC, Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, 16 CFR Part 255 (2009).

Additional:

• FTC Advertising FAQ’s: A Guide for Small Business (PDF version).
• Thomas W. Edman, Note, Lies, Damn Lies, and Misleading Advertising: The Role of Consumer Surveys in the Wake of Mead Johnson v. Abbott Labs, 43 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 417 (2001).
• Mead Johnson & Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, 201 F.3d 883 (7th Cir. 2000), opinion amended on denial of reh’g, 209 F.3d 1032 (7th Cir. 2000).
• Avis Rent a Car Sys., Inc. v. Hertz Corp., 782 F.2d 381 (2d Cir. 1986).

• Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, 551 U.S. 877 (2007).
• (TBA)

Additional:

• Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. 36 (1977) .
• Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, 504 U.S. 451 (1992).
• LePage’s Inc. v. 3M, 324 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 2003).
• Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 U. S. 373 (1911).
• State Oil v. Khan, 522 U.S. 3 (1997).
• Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145 (1968).
• Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 (1984).
• Kodak II, 125 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1997).
• Xerox, 203 F3d 1322 (Fed Cir 2000).
• Microsoft 2001, 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
• Robert H. Bork, Resale Price Maintenance and Consumer Welfare, 77 Yale L. J. 950 (1968).
• Michelle M. Burtis & Bruce H. Kobayashi, Why an Original Can be Better Than a Copy: Intellectual Property, the Antitrust Refusal to Deal, and ISO Antitrust Litigation,  9 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 143 (2001) (the Westlaw ver. omitted tables, so you may want to try SSRN instead).
• Constance E. Bagley & Gavin Clarkson, Adverse Possession for Intellectual Property: Adapting an Ancient Concept to Resolve Conflicts Between Antitrust and Intellectual Property Laws in the Information Age, 16 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 327 (2003).
• Benjamin Klein, Competitive Resale Price Maintenance in the Absence of Free Riding, 76 Antitrust L.J. 431 (2009).
• John Simpson & Abraham L. Wickelgren, Discounts, Leverage Theory, and Downstream Competition, 9 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 370 (2007).
• Alan J. Meese, Antitrust Balancing in a (Near) Coasean World: The Case of Franchise Tying Contracts, 95 Mich. L. Rev. 111 (1996).
• Louis Kaplow, Extension of Monopoly Power Through Leverage, 85 Colum. L. Rev. 515 (1985).

• Warren & Brandeis, The Right to Privacy, 4 Harv. L. Rev. 193 (1890).
• Articles by Justice Ginsburg.
• Articles citing Richard Posner’s “The Economics of Justice.”
• Most cited article by Bill Simon last year.
• Articles published by Yale Law School in the last 30 days.
• Kagan 大法官主筆的判決。
• Sotomayor 大法官發表不同意見之判決。
• 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(3) (2000).
• Sherman Act, as amended.
• Pub. L. No. 112-39.
• 愛國者法。
• FTC 主管之法律。
• 有關 Obama 政府金融改革的文章。

• Polygram Holding v. FTC, 416 F.3d 29 (D.C. Cir., 2005).
• Fashion Originators’ Guild of America v. FTC, 312 U.S. 457 (1941).

Additional reading:

• Robert Bork, The Rule of Reason and the Per Se Concept: Price Fixing and Market Division, 74 Yale L.J. 775 (1965) and 75 Yale L.J. 373 (1966).
• Kenneth L. Glazer, Concerted Refusals to Deal Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 70 Antitrust L.J. 1 (2002).
• Gary Minda, The Law and Metaphor of Boycott, 41 Buff. L. Rev. 807 (1993).
• Thomas M. Jorde & David J. Teece, Rule of Reason Analysis of Horizontal Arrangements: Agreements Designed to Advance Innovation and Commercialize Technology, 61 Antitrust L.J. 579 (1993).
• Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 (1918).
• NCAA v. University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984).
• Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co., 472 U.S. 284 (1985).
• FTC v. Indiana Federation of Dentists, 476 U.S. 447 (1986).
• California Dental Ass’n v. FTC, 526 U.S. 756 (1999).
• American Needle v. National Football League, 130 S.Ct. 2201 (2010).

• 認識公交法 (read relevant chapters).
• U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir.1945) (Part I & II, *421 – 439).
• DOJ Horizontal Merger Guidelines, Section 4 (PDF version).
• Phillip Areeda & Donald F. Turner, Predatory Pricing and Related Practices, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 697 (1975).

Additional reading:

• Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911).
• Aspen Skiing v. Aspen Highlands Skiing, 472 U. S. 585 (1985).
• Brooke Group v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 509 U.S. 209 (1993).
• 76 Antitrust L.J. xxx, Symposium: Issues at the Forefront of Monopolization and Abuse of Dominance (2010).
• 73 Antitrust L.J. xxx, Symposium–Aspen Skiing 20 Years Later (2005).
• Patrick Bolton, Joseph F. Brodley & Michael H. Riordan, Predatory Pricing: Strategic Theory and Legal Policy, 88 Geo. L.J. 2239 (2000).
• Abbott B. Lipsky, Jr. & J. Gregory Sidak, Essential Facilities, 51 Stan. L. Rev. 1187 (1999).

Important notes:

• We will meet at 10 AM, and conclude by 5 PM; lunch break after the 2nd paper.
• You are expected to read every paper (mostly done, I hope).
• Learn to take good control of your time; don’t try to read through your paper (we’ve read it). Highlight your main arguments when time is short, and elaborate when time permits.

Order of papers and reviewers:

Time allocation:

Mandatory:

• Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Haute Diggity Dog, LLC, 507 F.3d 252 (4th Cir., 2007).

Additional:

• The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006.
• Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003).
• KP Permanent Make–Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, 543 U.S. 111 (2004).
• Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition (Search in Westlaw by the citation “REST 3d UNCOM 1″, then click on the “Table of Contents” link on the left), in particular ch. 2 & 3.
• Restatement (Second) of Torts § 768 (1979): Competition As Proper Or Improper Interference (Search in Westlaw by the citation “REST 2d TORTS 768″).
• Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc., 514 U.S. 159 (1995).
• Michael Grynberg, Trademark Litigation as Consumer Conflict, 83 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 60 (2008).
• Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U.S. 569 (1994).
• Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2001).
• Mirage Editions, Inc. v. Albuquerque A.R.T. Co., 856 F.2d 1341 (1988).
• Lee v. A.R.T. Company, 125 F.3d 580 (7th Cir. 1997).