Antitrust

[Antitrust (Tue.)] 4/28 Tying

Mandatory:

Additional:

  • Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 (1984).
  • Kodak II, 125 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1997).
  • Xerox, 203 F3d 1322 (Fed Cir 2000).
  • Microsoft 2001, 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
  • Michelle M. Burtis & Bruce H. Kobayashi, Why an Original can be Better than a Copy: Intellectual Property, the Antitrust Refusal to Deal, and ISO Antitrust Litigation,  9 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 143 (2001) (The Westlaw ver. omitted tables, so you may want to try SSRN instead).
  • Constance E. Bagley & Gavin Clarkson, Adverse Possession For Intellectual Property: Adapting An Ancient Concept To Resolve Conflicts Between Antitrust And Intellectual Property Laws In The Information Age, 16 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 327 (2003).
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s