[lawecon] 6/18-19 Term paper presentations

I. Class meeting time: 10 am

II. Important notes:

  • The order of presentations will be decided by drawing at the beginning on Tuesday.
  • Each should prepare a 5-min. English summary of your paper, to be presented either at the start or the end of your presentation.
  • The reviewer is expected to examine the research questions, the assumptions (explicit or hidden), the analytical models of the paper, as well as the strength and weakness of its arguments. You’re the reviewer; be critical.
  • The reviewer should also look out for improper copy-pasting from other people’s works, inaccurate citations, and poor formatting jobs.
  • All are expected to read everyone else’s paper, in addition to the one you review. This is your last chance to shore up your participation score.
  • Learn to take good control of your time. Highlight your main arguments when time is short, and elaborate when time permits.
  • Each session lasts 1:20 or so. (see the time allocation table below).

III. Order of Presentations: to be decided via lottery when we convene on Tuesday.

IV. Pairing (click name for paper):

presenter reviewer
陳筠涵 張芝寧
郝玉媛 王治中
劉耀夫 卓冠儒
李思萱 王芮
張芝寧 林暐洋
林暐洋 郝玉媛
卓冠儒 李思萱
王治中 劉耀夫
王芮 陳筠涵

V. Time Allocation:

presentation 25 min.
review 10 min.
open discussion 15 min.
author’s final response 10 min.
moderator’s time 15 min.
Advertisements

[lawecon] 5/15 Criticisms and the Behavioral Approach

Mandatory:

  • Christine Jolls, Cass R. Sunstein & Richard Thaler, A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics, in Behavioral Law and Economics (Cass R. Sunstein ed., 2000).

Additional:

  • Margaret Jane Radin, The Colin Ruagh Thomas O’fallon Memorial Lecture on Reconsidering Personhood, 74 Or. L. Rev. 423 (1995).
  • Articles in Behavioral Law and Economics (Cass R. Sunstein, Ed., 2000).

[lawecon] 6/20-21 Final Paper Workshop

Class meeting time: 10:00

Important notes:

  • Please double check the order of presentations.
  • The reviewer is expected to examine the research question, the assumptions, and the logical connections of the arguments, as well as checking the citations, among other things.
  • All are expected to read everyone else’s paper, in addition to the one you review. This is your last chance to shore up your participation score.
  • Learn to take good control of your time. Highlight your main arguments when time is short, and elaborate when time permits.
  • Each session lasts 1:20 or so. (see the time allocation table below).

Order of Presentations:

21 (Wed.) 22 (Thu.)
presenter reviewer presenter reviewer
1 陳祺潔 徐聖惠 彭聖倫 林幸萱
2 林幸萱 梁雅涵 王溓安 范雅琇
3 秦語謙 彭聖倫 關凱文 吳尊傑
4 范雅琇 關凱文 梁雅涵 陳祺潔
5 吳尊傑 王溓安 徐聖惠 秦語謙

Time Allocation:

presentation 25 min.
review 10 min.
open discussion 20 min.
author’s final response 10 min.
moderator’s time 15 min.

[lawecon] 6/22 Term paper presentations

Class meeting time: 10 am

Important notes:

  • The order of presentations will be decided by drawing at the beginning on Thursday.
  • The reviewer is expected to examine the research questions, the assumptions (explicit or hidden), the analytical models of the paper, as well as the strength and weakness of its arguments. You’re the reviewer; be critical.
  • The reviewer should also look out for improper copy-pasting from other people’s works, inaccurate citations, and poor bluebooking jobs.
  • All are expected to read everyone else’s paper, in addition to the one you review. This is your last chance to shore up your participation score.
  • Learn to take good control of your time. Highlight your main arguments when time is short, and elaborate when time permits.
  • Each session lasts 1:20 or so. (see the time allocation table below).

Order of Presentations: to be decided via lottery on site.

Pairing (not the order of presentations) :

presenter reviewer
乃云 惠暄
惠暄 凱心
羽芯 宇哲
凱心 羽芯
宇哲 乃云

Time Allocation:

presentation 25 min.
review 10 min.
open discussion 15 min.
author’s final response 10 min.
moderator’s time 15 min.

[lawecon] 6/21-22 Paper Presentations

Class meeting time: 9:30 on 1/21 (Tue.).

Important notes:

  • The order of presentations will be decided by drawing at the beginning on Thursday.
  • The reviewer is expected to examine the research questions, the assumptions (explicit or hidden), the analytical models of the paper, as well as the strength and weakness of its arguments. You’re the reviewer; be critical.
  • The reviewer should also look out for improper copy-pasting from other people’s works, inaccurate citations, and poor bluebooking jobs.
  • All are expected to read everyone else’s paper, in addition to the one you review. This is your last chance to shore up your participation score.
  • Learn to take good control of your time. Highlight your main arguments when time is short, and elaborate when time permits.
  • Each session lasts 1:20 or so. (see the time allocation table below).

Presenter-reviewer Pairing (but NOT the order of presentations):

presenter reviewer
吳宇 林君蓉
陳怡辰 蕭明月
徐彥婷 黃麗瑾
林君蓉 羅蘭
蕭明月 徐彥婷
葉欣茹 鄭之穎
莊敏瑄 葉欣茹
鄭之穎 徐敏榕
黃麗瑾 陳怡辰
徐敏榕 吳宇
羅蘭 莊敏瑄

Time Allocation:

presentation 25 min.
review 10 min.
open discussion 20 min.
author’s final response 10 min.
moderator’s time 15 min.

[lawecon] 5/11 Criticisms and the Behavioral Approach

Mandatory:

  • Christine Jolls, Cass R. Sunstein & Richard Thaler, A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics, 50 Stan. L. Rev. 1471 (1998). (If you can’t finish the whole article, read at least Part I and Part II A., p.1473-97.)

Additional:

  • Margaret Jane Radin, The Colin Ruagh Thomas O’fallon Memorial Lecture on Reconsidering Personhood, 74 Or. L. Rev. 423 (1995).
  • Articles in Behavioral Law and Economics (Cass R. Sunstein, Ed., 2000).