[lawecon] 5/15 Criticisms and the Behavioral Approach

Mandatory:

  • Christine Jolls, Cass R. Sunstein & Richard Thaler, A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics, in Behavioral Law and Economics (Cass R. Sunstein ed., 2000).

Additional:

  • Margaret Jane Radin, The Colin Ruagh Thomas O’fallon Memorial Lecture on Reconsidering Personhood, 74 Or. L. Rev. 423 (1995).
  • Articles in Behavioral Law and Economics (Cass R. Sunstein, Ed., 2000).
Advertisements

[IPLaw] 1/2 非傳統商標

Mandatory reading:

  • Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holdings, Inc. 696 F.3d 206 (2th. Cir. 2012).

Additional reading:

  • Matal v. Tam, 137 S.Ct. 1744 (2017).
  • Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., 514 U.S. 159, 115 S.Ct. 1300 (1995).
  • Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. 112 S.Ct. 2753 (1992).
  • Nextel Commc’ns, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., 91 USPQ2d 1393 (TTAB 2009)_附件1.
  • Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG v. EUIPO, Case C‑30/15 (2016)_附件2.
  • Shield Mark BV v Joost Kist h.o.d.n. Memex, Case C-283/01 (2003)_附件3.
  • Eden v OHIM, Case T-305/04 (2005)_附件4.
  • In re Upper Deck Co., 59 USPQ2d 1688 (TTAB 2001).
  • 經訴字第10006098910號訴願決定書.
  • 智慧財產法院105年度行商訴字第41號行政判決_附件5.

 

[IPLaw] 12/26 Trademark Dilution

Mandatory reading:

  • STARBUCKS CORPORATION v. WOLFE’S BOROUGH COFFEE, INC. 736 F.3d 198 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit.
  • 智慧財產法院104年度民商上字第13號民事判決。

Additional reading (corrected):

  • Multi Time Machine v. Amazon 736 F.3d 198 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
  • Tiffany & Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp 994 F.Supp.2d 474 United States District Court, S.D. New York.
  • Coca-Cola Co. v. Gemini Rising, Inc. 346 F. Supp. 1183 (1972).
  • 智慧財產法院102年度民商上字第8號民事判決。
  • 最高法院105年度台上字第81號判決。
  • 最高行政法院判決 98年度判字第1487號。
  • 智慧財產法院行政判決 98年度行商更(一)字第11號。
  • 台北地方法院智簡字第30號刑事判決。
  • Matthew D. Bunker, Diluting Free Expression: Statutory First Amendment Proxies in Trademark Dilution Law, 22 Comm. L. & Pol’y 375 (2017).
  • Charles E. Colman, Trademark Law and the Prickly Ambivalence of Post-Parodies, 163 U. PA. L. Rev. Online 11 (2014).

[IPLaw] 12/19 資料庫之著作權保護

Mandatory reading:

  • Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340, 111 S. Ct. 1282 (1991).
  • 智慧局網路傳輸授權模式之研究與所發生之著作權爭議-期末報告書 (執行單位:益斯科技法律事務所)。

Additional reading:

  • West Pub. Co. v. Mead Data Cent., Inc., 799 F.2d 1219 (1986).
  • Matthew Bender & Co., Inc. v. West Pub. Co., 158 F.3d 693 (1998).
  • 智慧財產法院97年刑智上訴字第41號刑事判決。
  • 謝銘洋,論資料庫之法律保護,台大法學論叢,第二十七卷第二期,263頁~345頁。
  • William W. Fisher III, Recalibrating Originality, 54 Hous. L. Rev. 437 (2016). (The article is part of a symposium focusing on the topic.)

[IPLaw] 12/12 故事角色之著作權

Mandatory reading:

  • DC Comics v. Towle, 802 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2015).

Additional reading:

  • Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2001).
  • Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corporation, 45 F 2d. 119 (2d Cir. 1930).
  • Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc., 216 F.2d 945 (9th Cir.1954).
  • Olson v. National Broadcasting Co., 855 F.2d 1446,1452 (9th Cir. 1988).
  • 臺灣高等法院民事判決93年度智上字第14號.
  • 臺灣高等法院刑事判決96年度上訴字第1133號.

 

[Antitrust] 12/10-17 Mergers & Acquisitions

 Mandatory:

Additional:

  • DOJ Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines.
  • German Federal Cartel Office, Guidance on Substantive Merger Control (2012).
  • United States v. General Dynamics, 415 U. S. 486 (1974).
  • FTC v. Procter & Gamble Co., 386 U.S. 568 (1967).
  • Brown Shoe v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 (1962).
  • Omnicare, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc., 629 F.3d 697 (7th Cir. 2011).
  • FTC  v. Whole Foods Market, 548 F.3d 1028 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

[Antitrust] 12/3 Vertical Restraints of Trade

Mandatory reading:

Additional reading:

  • F.T.C. v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 136, 133 S. Ct. 2223 (2013).
  • Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. 36 (1977).
  • State Oil v. Khan, 522 U.S. 3 (1997).
  • Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145 (1968).
  • Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 U. S. 373 (1911).
  • Robert H. Bork, Resale Price Maintenance and Consumer Welfare, 77 Yale L. J. 950 (1968).